Hi, it's me cramming it in before the preliminary assessment.
I should have said, on reflection, that what makes Friere's method of education different from the norm is, basically, that it is relevant to the everyday lives of people. I also want to say at this point that I will be concluding my blog by asserting that community work isn't about work but is a way of life, an attitude. It's not something that you can switch off or compartmentalise. Although it is admirable for people to 'give back' to the community, in reality that is their agenda and this initially may be at odds with the needs of the community. With much listening and checking out common ground on which progress can be made, a common agenda can be found. Also there is no need to leave the College to find a community - the College is a community, as is the group of each year.
To get back to my group. I don't know if I mentioned that they were a group of middle aged women. Having agreed on confidentiality we then brainstormed what was seen as the main issues for women of their age group within their community. Issues identified were: financial, given the current climate; health, the older body, changes, obesity and fitness; family, children and grandchildren. The women got quite animated through having a platform to air concerns. I found that the final point about children/grandchildren was the issue most of the group felt strongly about. The meeting ended and given the length of time the group would be together decided to take this one issue to pursue it further using a Frierian method. That is for next week. Night Night all.